Talks and Poster Presentations (with Proceedings-Entry):

T. Janhunen, I. Niemelä, J. Oetsch, J. Puehrer, H. Tompits:
"Random vs. Structure-Based Testing of Answer-Set Programs: An Experimental Comparison";
Talk: 11th International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 2011), Vancouver, Canada; 2011-05-16 - 2011-05-19; in: "11th International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 2011)", Springer, (2011), ISBN: 978-3-642-20894-2; 242 - 247.

English abstract:
Answer-set programming (ASP) is an established paradigm for declarative problem solving, yet comparably little work on testing of answer-set programs has been done so far. In a recent paper, foundations for structure-based testing of answer-set programs building on a number of coverage notions have been proposed. In this paper, we develop a framework for testing answer-set programs based on this work and study how good the structure-based approach to test input generation is compared to random test input generation. The results indicate that random testing is quite ineffective for some benchmarks, while structure-based techniques catch faults with a high rate more consistently also in these cases.

answer-set programming, structure-based testing, random testing

Electronic version of the publication:

Related Projects:
Project Head Hans Tompits:
Softwareentwicklung in der Answer-Set Programmierung

Created from the Publication Database of the Vienna University of Technology.