[Zurück]

A. Aigner:
"Living in a monument - a matter of taste and class. A case study";
Estudo Prévio, 8 (2015), 28 S.

This paper addresses an increasingly observable but until now hardly examined phenomenon: how individuals, highly engaged with the symbolic value of architecture, appropriate modernist housing estates, progressively replacing the former residents who are mostly indifferent towards architecture. This process, long yearned for and welcomed by experts and culture lovers, is considered here as a form of `displacement through architecture´, or a type of gentrification that is anchored in the high appreciation of architecture. Using the example of the Vienna Werkbund estate (1932), an icon of modernist architecture that was declared as a national monument in 1978, this sociocultural change is illustrated by two user profiles representing the prevailing type of the `fully engaged connoisseur´ and the declining type of the `indifferent resident´. The paper employs ideas and concepts of Pierre Bourdieu to better understand how the economy of symbolic goods - of which architecture and architectural heritage are a part - works at the micro level of the users. The central argument is that monumentalization of architecture is a state supported hegemonic project of a cultural elite leading to exclusion of low-income and culturally less inclined residents in the long run.

modernist architecture, economy of symbolic goods, production of cultural value, architectural iconicity, lived-in monuments, architectural heritage, Wiener Werkbundsiedlung

http://repositorio.ual.pt/bitstream/11144/2448/1/EP8-P01-Anita_Aigner-www.estudoprevio.net.pdf