[Zurück]


Zeitschriftenartikel:

G. Sulyok, St. Sponar:
"Heisenberg´s error-disturbance uncertainty relation: Experimental study of competing approaches";
Physical Review A, 96 (2017), S. 022137-1 - 022137-8.



Kurzfassung englisch:
Over the past few years, Heisenberg´s error-disturbance uncertainty relation has experienced increased attention since several experimental publications verified the theoretical findings of Ozawa predicting the violation and thus necessary reformulation of Heisenberg´s relation. However, soon after their appearance, an alternative theory was presented by Busch and co-workers, which proclaimed the validity of Heisenberg´s relation and thus gave rise to heated debates. Here, we present an experimental comparison of the competing approaches by applying them to the same neutron optical measurement apparatus. Empirical results for the different definitions of error and disturbance are presented for special input states and configurations of the apparatus to illustrate the opposing approaches. The inequalities restricting errors and disturbances are particularly emphasized. Despite the strong controversy, in the case of projectively measured qubit observables, both approaches lead to equal outcomes.


"Offizielle" elektronische Version der Publikation (entsprechend ihrem Digital Object Identifier - DOI)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.022137


Erstellt aus der Publikationsdatenbank der Technischen Universität Wien.