[Zurück]

A. Mahdavi:
"What do Building Users want?";
Hauptvortrag: Technical Seminar by Professor Ardeshir Mahdavi @ NUS - National University of Singapore, Department of Building, School of Design & Environment, Singapore; 14.02.2019.

(kein deutscher Abstract)
Building designers, engineers, and managers are expected specify and maintain indoor environmental conditions in buildings that are deemed suitable for human occupancy. Toward this end, designers and engineers typically rely on various codes, standards, and guidelines. Thereby, the tacit assumption appears to be that such resources can be seamlessly traced back to explicitly established and thoroughly validated explanatory theories and models of people's perception and behavior in their surrounding environments. However, a closer examination of this assumption suggests that ultimate instances of such models may not be available. In this context, the present talk briefly revisits a number of high-level descriptions of humans' perception and action models proposed in the course of past century. This brief review suggests that it all but trivial to translate fundamental theoretical insights into practical engineering guidelines. Rather, this translation is hampered by a significant gap in our knowledge. The talk argues that, to address and amend this knowledge gap, a genuinely interdisciplianry approach is needed that involves both engineering and human sciences.

Building designers, engineers, and managers are expected specify and maintain indoor environmental conditions in buildings that are deemed suitable for human occupancy. Toward this end, designers and engineers typically rely on various codes, standards, and guidelines. Thereby, the tacit assumption appears to be that such resources can be seamlessly traced back to explicitly established and thoroughly validated explanatory theories and models of people's perception and behavior in their surrounding environments. However, a closer examination of this assumption suggests that ultimate instances of such models may not be available. In this context, the present talk briefly revisits a number of high-level descriptions of humans' perception and action models proposed in the course of past century. This brief review suggests that it all but trivial to translate fundamental theoretical insights into practical engineering guidelines. Rather, this translation is hampered by a significant gap in our knowledge. The talk argues that, to address and amend this knowledge gap, a genuinely interdisciplianry approach is needed that involves both engineering and human sciences.

https://publik.tuwien.ac.at/files/publik_278694.pdf