[Back]

J. P. Wallner:
"Structural Constraints for Dynamic Operators in Abstract Argumentation";
Argument & Computation, 11 (2020), 1-2; 151 - 190.

Many recent studies of dynamics in formal argumentation within AI focus on the well-known formalism of Dung´s argumentation frameworks (AFs). Despite the usefulness of AFs in many areas of argumentation, their abstract notion of arguments creates a barrier for operators that modify a given AF, e.g., in the case that dependencies between arguments have been abstracted away that are important for subsequent modifications. In this paper we aim to support development of dynamic operators on formal models in abstract argumentation by providing constraints imposed on the modification of the structure that can be used to incorporate information that has been abstracted away. Towards a broad reach, we base our results on the general formalism of abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) in abstract argumentation. To show applicability, we present two cases studies that adapt an existing extension enforcement operator that modifies AFs: in the first case study, we show how to utilize constraints in order to obtain an enforcement operator on ADFs that is allowed to only add support relations between arguments, and in the second case study we show how an enforcement operator on AFs can be defined that respects dependencies between arguments. We show feasibility of our approach by studying the complexity of the proposed structural constraints and the operators arising from the case studies, and by an experimental evaluation of an answer set programming (ASP) implementation of the enforcement operator based on supports.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/AAC-190471

Project Head Johannes Peter Wallner:
EMBArg

Project Head Stefan Woltran:
Neue Werkzeuge für graphenbasierte formale Argumentation