[Back]


Talks and Poster Presentations (without Proceedings-Entry):

R Hahn, C. Fuger, G Habler, H. Bolvardi, P. Polcik, P.H. Mayrhofer, H. Riedl:
"Fracture-Microstructure Relations of W-diboride Thin Films";
Talk: 47th International Conference on Metallurgical Coatings and Thin Films, ICMCTF, San Diego, CA, USA; 2021-04-26 - 2021-04-30.



English abstract:
Physical vapor deposited transition metal borides are an emerging class of materials. Their inherent promising properties range from ultra-low compressibility, highest thermal stability to chemical inertness, allowing an application as protective coating in quite harsh environments. Our recent ab initio calculations [1] suggest an attractive combination of high stiffness and appropriate high ductility for α-structured WB2-z (space group 191, AlB2-prototype, P6/mmm). This leads to an interesting combination of high hardness while maintaining a sufficient fracture toughness. The stabilization of the α-structure over the intrinsically favored ω-structure (space group 194, W2B5-prototype, P63/mmc) is based on omnipresent growth defects (e.g. various types of 0-dimensional vacancies) in the PVD process. However, next to the stabilized phases (hence prevalent bonding nature) also the morphology, especially column size and grain boundary interior, has a huge impact on the mechanical response.
Therefore, within this study we deposited various WB2-z coatings using different deposition techniques as well as parameters to modify the crystallite size and grain boundary constitution but also predominating phases. Subsequently, the mechanical properties of these coatings in the as deposited and annealed state have been analyzed by means of nanoindentation, microcantilever bending tests, and micropillar compression testing. Depending on the coating morphology, which varies from nanocrystalline (amorphous) to crystalline fibrous grown structures, the hardness, indentation modulus, and fracture toughness obtains a strong variation. Hardness and indentation modulus can be varied between 31±2 to 42±2 GPa and 440±30 and 560±30 GPa, respectively. The most significant variation though was found in the fracture toughness of these coatings: We calculated values within the framework given by Matoy et al. [2] between 2.5 and 4.7 MPa√m. Furthermore, we critically evaluate the comparability of distinct micromechanical testing techniques assessing the fracture behavior also with respect to the residual stress state.

References
[1] V. Moraes, H. Riedl, C. Fuger, P. Polcik, H. Bolvardi, D. Holec, P.H. Mayrhofer, Sci. Rep. (2018).
[2] K. Matoy, H. Schönherr, T. Detzel, T. Schöberl, R. Pippan, C. Motz, G. Dehm, Thin Solid Films 518 (2009) 247-256.

Keywords:
Fracture toughness, PVD, Coating


Related Projects:
Project Head Helmut Riedl:
CDL-SEC


Created from the Publication Database of the Vienna University of Technology.