[Zurück]


Zeitschriftenartikel:

S. Hetzl, J. Vierling:
"Clause Set Cycles and Induction";
Logical Methods in Computer Science, 16 (2020), 4.



Kurzfassung englisch:
In this article we relate a family of methods for automated inductive theorem proving based on cycle detection in saturation-based provers to well-known theories of induction. To this end we introduce the notion of clause set cycles -- a formalism abstracting a certain type of cyclic dependency between clause sets. We first show that the formalism of clause set cycles is contained in the theory of ∃1 induction. Secondly we consider the relation between clause set cycles and the theory of open induction. By providing a finite axiomatization of a theory of triangular numbers with open induction we show that the formalism of clause set cycles is not contained in the theory of open induction. Furthermore we conjecture that open induction and clause set cycles are incomparable. Finally, we transfer these results to a concrete method of automated inductive theorem proving called the n-clause calculus.


"Offizielle" elektronische Version der Publikation (entsprechend ihrem Digital Object Identifier - DOI)
http://dx.doi.org/10.23638/LMCS-16(4:11)2020


Erstellt aus der Publikationsdatenbank der Technischen Universität Wien.